STATUS REPORT

CUSTOMS CONVENTION ON CONTAINERS, 1972

(Geneva, 02/12/1972)

ENTRY INTO FORCE : 06 DECEMBER 1975

Depositary: Secretary-General of the United Nations

Last updated by PacLII: N/A
Parties Date of Signature Date of ratification
/
Other
Entry Into Force Domestication Legislation
(where available)
Algeria   14 Dec 1978 a    
Australia   10 Nov 1975 a    
Austria 22 May 1973 17 Jun 1977 Rt    
Azerbaijan [#]   17 Jan 2005 a    
Belarus [#] 22 Oct 1973 1 Sep 1976 Rt    
Bulgaria 12 Jan 1973 22 Feb 1977 Rt    
Burundi   4 Sep 1998 a    
Canada 5 Dec 1972 10 Dec 1975 Rt    
China   22 Jan 1986 a    
Cuba [#]   23 Nov 1984 a    
Czech Republic [#]   2 Jun 1993 d    
DECLARATIONS        
Finland 26 Dec 1973 22 Feb 1983 A    
Georgia   2 Jun 1999 a    
Greece 11 Jan 1973      
Hungary 10 Jan 1973 12 Dec 1973 Rt    
Indonesia   11 Oct 1989 a    
Kazakhstan   25 Jan 2005 a    
Liberia   16 Sep 2005 a    
Lithuania   27 Mar 2002 a    
Morrocco   14 Aug 1990 a    
New Zealand   20 Dec 1974 a    
Poland 20 Dec 1972 29 Apr 1982 Rt    
Republic of Korea 15 Jan 1973 19 Oct 1984 Rt    
Romania [#] 11 Dec 1973 6 Mar 1975 Rt    
Russian Federation 18 Oct 1973 23 Aug 1976 Rt    
Serbia and Montenegro   6 Sep 2001 a    
Slovakia [#]   28 May 1993 d    
Spain [#]   16 Apr 1975 a    
Switzerland [#] 5 Dec 1972 12 Oct 1976 Rt    
Trinidad and Tobago   23 Mar 1990 a    
Turkey [#] 15 Dec 1972 13 Jul 1994 Rt    
Ukraine [#] 22 Oct 1973 1 Sep 1976 Rt    
United States of America 5 Dec 1972 12 Nov 1984 Rt    
Uzbekistan   27 Nov 1996 a    
Keys:
  • Accession (a)
  • Acceptance (A)
  • Approval (AA)
  • Definitive Signature (s)
  • Formal confirmation (c)
  • Participation (P)
  • Notification (of provisional application, of special undertaking, etc) (n)
  • Ratification (Rt)
  • Reservation (r)
  • Succession (d)

(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made

upon ratification, acceptance, approval, accession or succession.)


Azerbaijan [up]

Reservation

La Rйpublique d'Azerbaпdjan n'autorise а entrer sur son territoire ni les conteneurs vides ou chargйs en provenance ou а destination de la Rйpublique d'Armйnie ni les conteneurs appartenant а des personnes physiques ou morales immatriculйes en Rйpublique d'Armйnie ou contrфlйs et exploitйs par de telles personnes


Belarus [up]

Upon signature and upon ratification

The Government of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the Byelorussian SSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the Byelorussian SSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case


Cuba [up]

Declaration

The Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Convention are of a discriminatory nature since they deprive certain States of the right to sign and accede to the Convention, contrary to the principle of universality

With reference to the rules set forth in article 25 of the Con- vention, the Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that differences arising between Parties should be resolved through direct negotiations by diplomatic means


Czech Republic [up]


Romania [up]

Upon signature and confirmed upon ratification

The Government of the Socialist Republic of Romania con- siders that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, concluded at Geneva on 2 December 1972, are not in accordance with the principle that multilateral treaties, the aims and objectives of which concern the world community as a whole, should be open to participation by all States


Slovakia [up]


Spain [up]

Reservation to article 9

Concerning containers granted temporary admission for the carriage of goods in internal traffic, . . . such admission will not be granted in Spain


Switzerland [up]

(a) Switzerland shall grant temporary admission to containers, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 6 of the Convention

(b) The use of containers which have been admitted tempor- arily for internal traffic, as provided for in article 9 of the Convention, shall be authorized subject to the two conditions laid down in annex 3 to the Convention


Turkey [up]

Upon signature

With reservations to paragraphs 3 and 4 of article 19

Upon signature and upon ratification

The Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the USSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the USSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case


Ukraine [up]

Upon signature and confirmed upon ratification

The Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the Ukrainian SSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the Ukrainian SSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case


© 1998 University of the South Pacific

PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback| Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/pits/en/status_pages/1972-3.html