PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Kiribati Sessional Legislation

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Kiribati Sessional Legislation >> Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act 2010

Database Search | Name Search | Noteup | Download | Help

  Download original PDF

Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act 2010

(No. 10 of 2010)

I assent,




MADE by the Maneaba ni Maungatabu and assented to by Te Beretitend

1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2010.

2. Amendment of Section 3

Section 3 of the principal Act is amended by amending the definition of the words "trade dispute" by inserting after the word "dismissal" and before the words "or suspension" the word "termination", with a comma immediately before and immediately after such word as follows:


3. Amendment of section 14

Section 14 of the principal Act is amended as follows:-

(a) at subsection 2 (b) by inserting a comma after the word "salary" and before the word "wages" and by repealing the word "construct" and substituting the word "contract";

(b) at subsection 3 by repealing the entire subsection and substituting the following subsection 3,

(3) (a) The Tribunal shall not have the power to award to any party to a dispute damages, compensation or costs or to compel any employer to reinstate an employee or former employee, except as provided in subsection (b).

(b) Where an employee, or a former employee has his contract of service terminated by his employer, the Tribunal may order that the employee or former employee be reinstated if the Tribunal finds on the balance of probabilities that the employer has exercised its power to terminate wrongfully, unjustifiably or the decision to terminate is based upon irrelevant considerations; and may in addition, award such employee whatever salary, wages or allowances or any other sum of money whatsoever payable under a contract of service in force at the time the award is made,”




Over the past sittings, the Maneaba ni Maungatabu had been vigorously debating whether the employees or former employees who had their contracts of service terminated, as opposed to their being dismissed, should be accorded an avenue to dispute their terminations as they feel that the power of termination exercised by their employers had been blatantly abused and in most cases unjustified. Most of the grievances aired emanated from the Government's owned companies. The debates centred around giving anyone in authority the power to reverse or to review the decision of the employers in cases of termination, The method proposed in the debate is to address the matter individually by each employing or corporations or agency concerned to have in place whether by way of agreement or contract between them and their respective employees, or by other means where the employer is subjected to being reviewed in its decision concerning the termination of the contract if services of its employees. The methodology cannot function if an individual employing organization, corporation or agency refuses to have in place such reviewing clause.

A more unilateral approach is to legislate it. The most appropriate legislation to put such concept in is the Industrial Relations Code (1998), which figured strongly in the previous debates in the Maneaba. In a attempt to insert such concept in the legislation an amendment is proposed to be made to the Industrial Relations Code by extending the definition of "trade dispute" to cover termination in order for the Tribunal established under the said Code to be able to deal with matters concerning termination, Section 14 of the Code which addresses this very issues in the negative must be refined, The Act does that by refining subsection (3) to address the issue of "termination" specifically. Whilst the opportunity arises, a cosmetic amendment is made to subsection (2) (b) by correcting the word "construct" to "contract".

The bottom line is that where an employee has his or her contract of services terminated by his or her employer as opposed to being dismissed, and such employee feels that the exercise of such power to terminate by his or her employer has been exercised wrongly, unjustified or based on irrelevant consideration, he or she can take it up to the Industrial Tribunal as an "industrial dispute" and may be able to ash for reinstatement and other payments that were supposed to be paid to him or her by way of wages or salary or other allowances,

Titabu Tabane
Attorney Generai


This printed impression of the Industrial Relations Code Amendment) Act 2010 has been carefully examined by me with the Bill which passed the Maneaba ni Maungatabu on the 29th November 2010 and is found by me to be a true and correctly printed copy of the said Bill.

Eni Tekanene
Clerk of the Maneaba ni Maungatabu


I certify that the above Bill, was on 29th November 2010 passed by the Maneaba ni Maungatabu upon a Certificate of Urgency under section 68(3)(a) of the Constitution.

Hon Taomati
Speaker of the Maneaba ni Maungatabu

Published by exhibition at the Maneaba ni Maungatabu this 6 day of December 2010.

Eni Tekanene
Clerk of the Maneaba ni Maungatabu

PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback