|
LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
| Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
| 2019 THRHR 140-145 |
|
South Africa | circa 2019 |
|
1 |
||
| 2019 THRHR 136-146 |
|
South Africa | circa 2019 |
|
1 |
||
| Jansen and Neethling |
|
South Africa | circa 2017 |
|
1 |
||
| [2015] University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2149 | [2015] University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2149 | University of Pennsylvania Law Review | United States | circa 2015 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| "Reasonableness in and out of Negligence Law" | [2015] University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2131 | University of Pennsylvania Law Review | United States | circa 2015 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| Medi-Clinic Ltd v Vermeulen |
[2014] ZASCA 150; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 26 Sep 2014 | SAFLII |
|
40 ![]() ![]() |
| Loureiro v Imvula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd |
[2014] ZACC 4; |
Constitutional Court of South Africa | South Africa | 20 Mar 2014 | SAFLII |
|
73 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| [2011] Scott 2014 |
|
Court of Common Pleas | United Kingdom | circa 2014 |
|
1 |
|
| [2014] Dejure 374-392 |
|
circa 2014 |
1 |
||||
| [2014] Dejure 390 |
|
circa 2014 |
1 |
||||
| Imvula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd v Loureiro (130/12) |
[2013] ZASCA 12; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 15 Mar 2013 | SAFLII |
|
12 ![]() |
| "The Reasonable Person" | [2012] New York University Law Review 323 | New York University Law Review | United States | circa 2012 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| Jacobs v Chairman, Governing Body, Rhodes High School |
[2011] DEJURE 11; |
High Court of South Africa - Western Cape Division | South Africa | 4 Nov 2010 | SAFLII |
|
10 |
| Orchard v Lee |
[2009] EWCA Civ 295; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 3 Apr 2009 | BAILII |
|
5 |
| Imbree v McNeilly; McNeilly v Imbree |
[2008] HCA 40; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 28 Aug 2008 | AustLII |
|
115 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Louwrens v Oldwage |
[2005] ZASCA 81; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 21 Sep 2005 | SAFLII |
|
59 ![]() ![]() |
| Eskom Holdings Ltd v Hendricks |
[2005] ZASCA 46; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 27 May 2005 | SAFLII |
|
15 ![]() |
| [2005] MLR 688 |
|
Malaysia | circa 2005 |
|
2 |
||
| [2005] MLR 681-682 |
|
Malaysia | circa 2005 |
|
1 |
||
| [2005] MLR 681-695 |
|
Malaysia | circa 2005 |
|
2 |
||
| [2005] MLR 683 |
|
Malaysia | circa 2005 |
|
1 |
||
| [2005] MLR 694-695 |
|
Malaysia | circa 2005 |
|
1 |
||
| Blake v Galloway |
|
United Kingdom | circa 2004 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| Minister of Safety and Security v Carmichele |
[2003] ZASCA 117; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 14 Nov 2003 | SAFLII |
|
61 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| 2002 South African Law Journal 287 |
|
South African Law Journal | South Africa | circa 2002 | HeinOnline |
|
1 |
| "Self-defence: The 'Unreasonable' Reasonable Man" |
|
South African Law Journal | South Africa | circa 2002 | HeinOnline |
|
1 |
| Another |
[1999] ZASCA 87; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 26 Nov 1999 | SAFLII |
|
97 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Mukheiber v Raath |
[1999] ZASCA 39; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 28 May 1999 | SAFLII |
|
38 ![]() ![]() |
| 1998 1 SA 163 |
|
South Africa | circa 1998 | LexisNexis |
|
2 |
|
| Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1998 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
11 ![]() |
|
| Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority |
[1997] UKHL 46; |
House of Lords | United Kingdom | 13 Nov 1997 | BAILII |
|
453 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Mullin v Richards |
[1997] EWCA Civ 2662; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 6 Nov 1997 | BAILII |
|
11 ![]() |
| 32 Journal of Consumer Policy 1997 |
|
Journal of Consumer Policy | Germany | circa 1997 |
|
1 |
|
| 414 Journal of Consumer Policy 1997 |
|
Journal of Consumer Policy | Germany | circa 1997 |
|
1 |
|
| [1996] Stanford Law Review 329 |
|
Stanford Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| "Reasonableness and Rationality in Negligence Theory" |
|
Stanford Law Review | United States | circa 1996 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| "A Feminist View of the Reasonable Man: an Alternative Approach to Liability in Negligence for Personal Injury" | [1994] Anglo-American Law Review 334 | Anglo-American Law Review | circa 1994 |
2 |
|||
| "A Feminist View of the Reasonable Man: an Alternative Approach to Liability in Negligence for Personal Injury" | [1994] Anglo-American Law Review 334 | Anglo-American Law Review | circa 1994 |
2 |
|||
| Simon's Town Municipality v Dews (677/91) |
[1992] ZASCA 165; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 23 Sep 1992 | SAFLII |
|
13 ![]() |
| "A Lawyer's Primer on Feminist Theory and Tort" |
|
Journal of Legal Education | United States | circa 1988 | HeinOnline |
|
1 |
| Mansfield v Weetabix |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| S v Campher |
|
South Africa | circa 1987 | LexisNexis |
|
15 ![]() |
|
| Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
62 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Cook v Cook |
[1986] HCA 73; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 2 Dec 1986 | AustLII |
|
301 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital & Maudsley Hospital Board |
[1985] UKHL 1; |
House of Lords | United Kingdom | 21 Feb 1985 | BAILII |
|
285 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1985 | LexisNexis |
|
233 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| (1984) 164 Journal of Consumer Policy 1984 | (1984) 164 Journal of Consumer Policy 1984 | Journal of Consumer Policy | Germany | circa 1984 |
|
1 |
|
| [1984] John Marshall Law Review 885 |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| [1984] John Marshall Law Review 889 |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| [1984] John Marshall Law Review 891 |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| [1984] John Marshall Law Review 892 |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| [1984] John Marshall Law Review 884 |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| "Negligence and the Elderly: A Proposal for a Relaxed Standard of Care" |
|
John Marshall Law Review | United States | circa 1984 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
|
1 |
| Weber v Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk |
|
South Africa | circa 1983 | LexisNexis |
|
18 ![]() |
|
| Hafajee v South African Railways and Harbours |
|
South Africa | circa 1981 | LexisNexis |
|
3 |
|
| "Is the Reasonable Man Obsolete? A Critical Perspective on Self-defence and Provocation" | [1981] Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 435 | Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review | United States | circa 1981 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| 21 Journal of Consumer Policy 1981 |
|
Journal of Consumer Policy | Germany | circa 1981 |
|
1 |
|
| S v Chretien |
|
South Africa | circa 1981 | LexisNexis |
|
21 ![]() ![]() |
|
| Frechette v F Welch |
621 F2d 11; |
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit | United States | 6 May 1980 | WorldLII |
|
5 |
| Roberts v Ramsbottom |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1980 | LexisNexis |
|
23 ![]() ![]() |
|
| Alaska |
|
United States | circa 1980 |
|
2 |
||
| McNeely v M & M Supermarkets Inc |
|
United States - Georgia | circa 1980 |
|
1 |
||
| St Mary's Hosp Inc v Bynum, Ark |
|
US | circa 1978 |
1 |
|||
| Michaud v Dupuis |
|
Canada - New Brunswick | circa 1977 |
|
1 |
||
| Clark v Welsh |
|
South Africa | circa 1976 | LexisNexis |
|
1 |
|
| Roxa v Mtshayi |
|
South Africa | circa 1975 | LexisNexis |
|
11 ![]() |
|
| Nettleship v Weston |
[1971] EWCA Civ 6; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 30 Jun 1971 | BAILII |
|
61 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Stewart v Jefferson Plywood Co |
|
Canada | circa 1970 |
|
1 |
||
| Pollock v Lipkowitz |
|
Canada | circa 1970 |
|
1 |
||
| Alexander and Szas |
|
Notre Dame Law Review | United States | circa 1967 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| McHale v Watson |
[1966] HCA 13; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 7 Mar 1966 | AustLII |
|
118 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| [1965] Journal of Consumer Policy 1966 | [1965] Journal of Consumer Policy 1966 | Journal of Consumer Policy | Germany | circa 1966 |
|
1 |
|
| Kruger v Coetzee |
|
South Africa | circa 1966 | LexisNexis |
|
422 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Jones v Santam Bpk |
|
South Africa | circa 1965 | LexisNexis |
|
36 ![]() ![]() |
|
| Wooldridge v Sumner |
[1962] EWCA Civ 3; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 4 Jun 1962 | BAILII |
|
33 ![]() ![]() |
| Wells v Cooper |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1958 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
6 |
|
| Adamson v Motor Vehicle Insurance Trust |
[1957] WALawRp 1; |
Australia - Western Australia | 18 Mar 1957 | AustLII |
|
11 ![]() |
|
| Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1957 | LexisNexis |
|
629 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| ; Esterhuizen v Administrator, Transvaal |
|
South Africa | circa 1957 | LexisNexis |
|
2 |
|
| Lengyel v Manitoba Power Commission |
|
Canada | circa 1957 |
|
1 |
||
| Roe v Ministry of Health |
[1954] EWCA Civ 7; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 8 Apr 1954 | BAILII |
|
113 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Herschel v Mrupe |
|
South Africa | circa 1954 | LexisNexis |
|
60 ![]() ![]() |
|
| Gough v National Coal Board |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1954 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
7 |
|
| Morriss v Marsden |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1952 | LexisNexis |
|
17 ![]() |
|
| R v Verster |
|
South Africa | circa 1952 | LexisNexis |
|
17 ![]() |
|
| Glasgow Corporation v Muir |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1943 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| Philips v William Whiteley Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1938 | LexisNexis |
|
10 |
|
| [2004] Fordham Law Review 1929 |
|
Fordham Law Review | United States | circa 1929 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| ; Lymbrey v Jefferies |
|
circa 1925 |
3 |
||||
| Van Wyk v Lewis |
|
circa 1924 |
113 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
| Cooke v Midland Great Western Railway of Ireland |
[1909] UKLawRpAC 7; |
United Kingdom | 1 Mar 1909 | CommonLII |
|
56 ![]() ![]() |
|
| Vaughan v Menlove |
[1837] EngR 424; |
Court of Common Pleas | United Kingdom | circa 1837 | CommonLII |
|
55 ![]() ![]() |
| Kirkman v Kirkman |
[1807] EngR 158; |
United Kingdom | circa 1807 | CommonLII |
|
7 |
|
| Lafayette Par Sch Bd v Cormier ex rel Cormier |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Price v Kitsap Transit |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Frazier v Common Wealth |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Lenard v Dilley |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Williams v Kearbey |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
3 |
||
| 771 Nys2d 269 |
|
United States - New York | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Hancock-Underwood v Knight |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| First Nat'l Bank of Ariz v Dupree |
|
United States - Arizona | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Goodrich v Blair |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Steele v Holiday Inns Inc |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Savage Indus v Duke |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Robinson v Lindsay |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| 560 P2d 873 |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Polmatier v Russ |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Fields v Senior Citizens Ctr Inc |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Blakes v Blakes |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Mastland Inc v Evans Furniture Inc |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Sinai v Polinger Co |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
5 |
||
| Purtle v Shelton |
|
US |
4 |
||||
| Gossett v Jackson |
|
United States |
|
1 |
|||
| Jackson v McCuiston |
|
US | circa 1985 |
2 |
|||
| Horton v Hinley |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Trentacost v Brussel |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Pritchard v Veterans Cab Co |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Adams v Lopez |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Moore v Preenell |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Lutzkovitz v Murray |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
3 |
||
| Dorais v Paquin |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Howle v PYA/Monarch Inc |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Robins v City of Wichita |
|
United States - Kansas | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Massey v Scripter |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Roberts v Ring |
|
United States - Minnesota | circa 1985 |
|
3 |
||
| Fink v City of New York |
|
United States - New York | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Queen Ins v Hammond |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Dellwo v Pearson |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
8 |
||
| Goodfellow v Coggburn |
|
United States - Idaho | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Michigan Central Railroad v Hassenyer |
|
United States - Michigan | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| Torres v City of Los Angeles |
|
United States - California | circa 1985 |
|
1 |
||
| McGuire v Almy |
|
United States | circa 1985 |
|
3 |
||
| Lehmuth v Long Beach Unified Sch Dist |
|
United States - California | circa 1985 |
|
2 |
||
| Lugtu v Cal Highway Patrol |
|
United States - California | circa 1985 |
|
![]() |