LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

State v Qoli [1997] FJLawRp 25   flag  2

(1997) 43 FLR 195
Federal Law Reports
Australia
11th August, 1997

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
[32] Therefore, at the close of the prosecution case the trial Judge is bound to give his mind to this vital issue as to whether there is evidence that the accused person committed the offence The test to be applied at this threshold is whether there is some relevant and admissible evidence in respect of each element that must be proved before the accused could be convicted of the offence alleged against him in the Information [see State v Anthony Frederick Stephens Australia 6 Aug 1998 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 4
State v Rokotuiwai [1998] FJLawRp 18 (1998) 44 FLR 28 Australia 31 Mar 1998 PacLII flag 1

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
R v Croydon Justices; Ex parte Dean [1993] QB 769; [1993] 3 All ER 129; [1993] 3 WLR 198; (1993) 98 Cr App R 76; [1993] Crim LR 759 United Kingdom circa 1993 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 84
R v Munro (1993) 97 Cr App R 183 United Kingdom circa 1993 LexisNexis flag 7
R v Munro [1993] Cr App R 183 United Kingdom circa 1993 LexisNexis flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback