![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Civil
Jurisdiction)
Civil Case No. 70 of
2007
BETWEEN:
IRIRIKI ISLAND
HOLDINGS
Claimant
AND:
ASCENSION
LIMITED
Defendant
Coram: Justice
Tuohy
Counsels: Mr. Ozols for
Claimant
Mr. Sugden for
Defendant
Date of Conference: 26
July 2007
Date of Decision: 31 July
2007
RULING
1. Counsel have requested the Court to deal with the
defendant’s application to strike out the claim on the basis that there
is
no reasonable cause of action shown. The existence of the jurisdiction to strike
out a claim on this ground was recognized by
the Court of Appeal in
Noel –v- Champagne Beach Working
Committee [2006] VUCA 18; CAC 24/06 (6
October 2006. However the Court recognized that the jurisdiction should be
exercised sparingly and only in a clear case where
the Court is satisfied that
it has the requisite material. The claimant’s case must be so clearly
untenable that it cannot
possibly succeed.
2. Counsel have each adopted
the submissions that were made to the Court on the Claimant’s application
for an interim injunction,
which I refused in my ruling of 31st May 2007. In
that ruling I held that there was no serious question to be tried. In my view
there
is no material difference between the standard which the claimant must
establish in relation to interim relief that there is a serious
question to be
tried and the standard which a defendant must attain in order to succeed on a
strike out application under the Court’s
inherent jurisdiction. My views
on the issues have not changed. I therefore find that there is no reasonable
cause of action in this
case and the application to strike out is therefore
granted. The reasons for my decision are those set out in my ruling of 31st May
2007, which is attached for reference.
Dated
at Port Vila, this 31st day of July,
2007
BY THE
COURT
C.N.
TUOHY
Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2007/69.html