![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Criminal
Jurisdiction)
CRIMINAL CASE No.85 of 2006
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-v-
JSERETY BICE
Ms
Kayleen Tavoa, Public
Prosecutor
The
Defendant in person and on her own behalf
JUDGMENT
This is the trial of the
Defendant, Jserety Bice. This Defendant is charged with the offences of Unlawful
Possession of Cannabis Plants,
contrary to Section 2(13) of the Dangerous Drugs
Act [CAP.12] and Cultivation of Cannabis Plants, contrary to Section 4 of the
same Act.
Messrs Nigel Morrison
and Christina Thyna of Ridgway Blake Lawyers represented this Defendant, like
the 21 other Defendants, from
the Preliminary Inquiry to the plea processes. At
the trial, the defence counsel were excused from representing the
Defendant.
The prosecution and the
defence counsel have considered the case prior to court sitting and agreed that
the following statements and
exhibits go in by consent:-
(1) Moses Tom
(2) Erickson Paul
(3) Hickson Siba
(4) Exhibits
- Plants
- Photos
- Crime scene report
The
brief facts are that on 20 October 2006 the Defendant was arrested at Melip
Village, South West Malekula after a complaint made
by Moses Tom, Chief of
Melip.
The police have discovered
that the Defendant had cultivated 31 cannabis plants in her garden. This is
confirmed by her mother and
the Defendant Tovor Bice. Police removed the plants
and brought the Defendant with the plants in Port-Vila. The plants were
identified
and weighed. The weight is 1.90kg. The plants were tested and the
test showed the presence of cannabis substance in the
plants.
The Defendant admitted she
planted cannabis because cannabis plant is ‘God’s
creation’.
She was
cross-examined. She said she is a member of an association. Cannabis became
popular at Melip Village in 2000 after Moïse
Tothes Païs brought them
to Vanuatu. She admitted also that cannabis is good money. When challenged on
whether the defence of
"God’s creation" is an excuse because the real
reason for planting cannabis is that cannabis provide good money, she confirmed
that.
The law is that the
prosecution must prove the element of the offence on beyond reasonable doubt. If
there is a reasonable doubt,
I must acquit the Defendant.
Sections 2(13); 4 and 17 of the
Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12] are the relevant provisions. They provide as
follows:-
"PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES AND MATERIALS
2. The ... possession in Vanuatu of the following substances and materials... is prohibited:
(13) Cannabis"
"PROHIBITION OF CULTIVATION OF CANNABIS PLANT
4. The cultivation of any plant of the genus Cannabis shall be prohibited."
"PENALTIES FOR CONTRAVENTION OF REGULATION
17. Every contravention of this regulation shall constitute an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding 100 million Vatu or to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 20 years or to both such fine and imprisonment."
Applying
the law to the facts as found, there is evidence against the Defendant on the
offence of cultivation of Cannabis plants.
There is not enough evidence on the
offence of Unlawful Possession of
Cannabis.
The Defendant, Jserety
Bice is convicted on the charge of cultivation of cannabis plants, contrary to
Section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12].
The Defendant, Jserety Bice is
acquitted on the charge of unlawful possession of cannabis, contrary to Section
2(13) of the
Act.
VERDICT
COUNT
1: GUILTY and CONVICTED for the offence of Cultivation of
Cannabis
COUNT 2: NOT GUILTY and
ACQUITTED on the charge of unlawful Possession of
Cannabis
I direct that the 31
plants of Cannabis seized from the Defendant be condemned by 8 May 2007 before
lunch
time.
DATED at
Port-Vila this 7th day of May 2007
BY THE COURT
Vincent
LUNABEK
Chief
Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2007/36.html