![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
CRIMINAL CASE No.96 of 2006
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-v-
MOÏSE TOHTES PAÏS
Ms Kayleen Tavoa,
Public Prosecutor
The Defendant in
person and on his own behalf
JUDGMENT
This is the trial of the Defendant, Moise Totes Bice. He
is charged with one count of the offence of Possession of Cannabis, contrary
to
Section 2(13) of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12]. This defendant, like the 21
other defendants, was represented by the Law Firm of Ridgway Blake Lawyers until
the plea stages.
The defence counsel were excused for appearance on behalf of
the Defendant at the trial with the leave of the Court.
The prosecution
and the defence counsel have considered the case prior to Court sitting and
agreed that the following statements and
exhibits go in by consent:-
(1) Moses Tom
(2) George Twomey
(3) Gerald Molturalala
Exhibits
- Plants
- Photo
- Crime Scene report
The brief facts show that
Moses Tom, the Chief of Melip reported the defendant to the police. The police
were deployed to Malekula
on the RVS Tukoro. The police arrested the defendant
and brought him to Vila with the Cannabis seized from him. This defendant was
the ring leader of the 21 others defendants as he encouraged the other persons
to plant the cannabis plants to make money. The defendant
had on him 2 big roll
joint of Cannabis and a plastic containing seeds and leaves of cannabis. The
cannabis was identified, weighed
and tested. The weight is 0.005 kg. The result
of the text show the presence of cannabis substance in the cannabis leaves and
seeds
seized from him.
The defendant gave evidence. He admitted that when
the police arrested him he had a roll of cannabis. He said he worked in New
Caledonia
for 30 years. He came back to Vanuatu in 1997. He planted Cannabis at
Melip Village. He distributed. The cannabis law of Vanuatu
is a Foreign
Law.
He said he is the Director of the Association. He stands on the 10
Commandments. He said he knew the laws of Vanuatu. He said he planted
cannabis
on basis of his faith. He said respect all other laws except the law of
cannabis. He did not know about the negative side
of the cannabis. He said his
stand is the bible. Cannabis is god’s creation. Cannabis brings peace,
blessing and power. He
said he is the Director of South West Malekula
Cooperative Association. Nobody will stops cannabis in Vanuatu and even law
could
not stop cannabis.
The law is that the prosecution must prove the
elements of the offence charged against the Defendant beyond reasonable doubt.
If there
is a reasonable doubt, the defendant must be acquitted.
Section
2(13), 4 and 17 of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12] are the relevant provisions.
They provided as follows:-
"PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES AND MATERIALS
2. The .... possession in Vanuatu of the following substances and materials ... is prohibited:
(13) Cannabis"
"PROHIBITION OF CULTIVATION OF CANNABIS PLANT
4. The cultivation of any plant of the genus Cannabis shall be prohibited."
"PENALTIES FOR CONTRAVENTION OF REGULATION
17. Every contravention of this regulation shall constitute an offence punishable by a fine not exceeding 100 million Vatu or to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 20 years or to both such fine and imprisonment."
This Defendant
challenges the prosecution and says that the prosecution charged a wrong person.
He says he is not the person called
"MOISE TOTES BICE". In his
cross-examination, he admitted that his name is "PAÏS TOHTES MOÏSE"
and he came to Court to
explain to everyone including the Government his vision
about allowing the cultivation of cannabis plants in Vanuatu.
The Court
is satisfied that, although, the name of this Defendant is wrongly spelt and
written, the Defendant is the same person or
man arrested at Melip village, on
20 October 2006. The Defendant’s challenge is rejected as
baseless.
Applying the law of the facts, I am satisfied that the
prosecution has proved the offence of possession, contrary to Section 2(13)
of
the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12] proved against the defendant MOÏSE TOHTES
PAÏS beyond reasonable
doubt.
VERDICT
PAÏS
TOHTES MOÏSE is found guilty of the offence of Possession of Cannabis,
contrary to Section 2(13) of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP.12] and convicted of
the said offence, accordingly.
I direct that the quantity of Cannabis
seized from the defendant be condemned by 8 May 2007 before lunch
time.
DATED at Port Vila this 6th day
of May, 2007
BY THE COURT
Vincent
LUNABEK
Chief Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2007/27.html