![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Civil
Jurisdiction)
CIVIL CASE No. 148 of 2001
BETWEEN:
KEVIN
& WENDY CAIN
Plaintiffs
AND:
ROBERT
F AGIUS
Defendant
Mr. Ozols for the
claimants
Mr. Hurley for the
defendant
JUDGMENT
This is an application by
the defendant dated 8 September 2003 and filed on 9 September 2003. The
application is made pursuant to
rule 15.25 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2002,
seeking that the claimants provide the further sum of Vatu 140,000 for security
for
costs on the action.
Before
the coming into force of the Civil Procedure Rules of 2002, an application for
security for costs was made and granted in favour
of the
defendant.
The claimants reside
outside Vanuatu. They have no assets in Vanuatu apart from the amount of
security ordered and paid into the trust
fund of their
counsel.
This application is for
the payment of an additional sum of 140,000 Vatu for security for costs made
under the new Civil Procedure
Rules
2002.
I deal with this application
as if it is an application seeking to vary an order for security previously
done.
Rules 15.23
states:
“The Court may... vary an order for security for costs if the court is satisfied that:
(a) the security is no longer necessary; or
(b) there are other special circumstance.”
Mr.
Hurley submits that the costs of time spent and the preparation of the sworn
statements are well over the amount of security already
paid.
The additional amount of
Vatu 140,000 for security is necessary to cover the subsequent costs incurred
for the time taken and the
preparation of sworn
statements.
Mr. Ozols concedes to
this effect. The coming into force of the new rules constitute special
circumstances warranting for further
amount of security for costs to be
ordered.
ORDER
1. The claimants shall provide the further sum of Vatu 140,000 for the security for costs on the action within 14 days from the date of this Order.
2. The costs are for the claimants. They be agreed if not taxed.
DATED
at Port-Vila this
22nd
day of October 2003
BY THE COURT
Vincent
LUNABEK
Chief
Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/91.html