![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Criminal
Jurisdiction)
CRIMINAL CASE No. 39
of 2002
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR
-v-
MARKE
LOWEN
Coram: Chief Justice
Vincent Lunabek
Counsels: Mr. Liam
Shaw for the Public Prosecutor
Mr.
John Malcolm for the Defendant
SENTENCE
This is the sentence of
the defendant, Mark Lowen. The defendant was initially charged with a total of
some 270 counts contrary to
the provisions of the Vanuatu National Provident
Fund Act [CAP. 189]. He was then found guilty and convicted of 138
counts.
Those 138 counts relate to
four (4) categories of offences:
(a) Failing to register as an employer of the five employees (Akesha Litch, Rex Issachar, Winston Tarere, Jonas Cullwick, Antony Ligo) of Port Vila Presse, contrary to Section 22 of the V.N.P.F. Act [CAP. 189];
(b) Failing to register those employees as employees under the Act, contrary to Section 23 of the Act;
(c) Failing to pay VNPF contributions to the fund in favour of each of those employees to the fund, contrary to Section 26(1) of the Act; and
(d) Having failed to pay contributions, failing to pay the applicable surcharge in favour of each employee to the fund contrary to Section 26(2) of the Act.
The
offences are set out respectively below and in the following 138
accounts:-
• Count 1
• Counts 29 to 45;
• Counts 46 to 78;
• Counts 151 to 182;
• Counts 213 to 234.
The
138 counts against the defendant reflect a period of criminal conduct extending
from 2001 to June 2002. This represents some eighteen
(18) months of failing to
comply with the scheme in relation to five
employees.
Under the VNPF Act the
provisions referred to above mandate those requirements. In the event of failing
to comply, then, Section 50
of the said Act provides in each case a maximum
penalty to be imposed of a fine of VT100,000 or imprisonment for 6 months or to
both
such fine and
imprisonment.
The following are
the details of unpaid contributions and surcharges requested by the Prosecution
for each of the relevant employees.
|
Name
|
Employee
share contributions
|
Employer
share contributions
|
Surcharge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akesha Litch
|
33,600
|
33,600
|
10,080
|
|
Rex Issachar
|
73,800
|
73,800
|
50,580
|
|
Winston Tarere
|
72,000
|
72,000
|
50,500
|
|
Jonas Cullwick
|
70,800
|
70,800
|
44,040
|
|
Antony Ligo
|
49,800
|
49,800
|
21,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
300,000
|
300,000
|
176,980
|
The total amount owing and
requested by the prosecution for the relevant employees for the period of time
referred to in the charges
in accordance with Sections 51 and 52 of the Act, is
VT776,980.
The prosecution also
applies for prosecution costs of
VT300,000.
The defendants accepts
to pay the recovery of unpaid contributions and surcharges of
VT776,980.
However, it is said
that the defendant doubles the salaries of the 5 employees on the understanding
that each of them will get a business
licence. He said he was wrong. He has now
to pay an additional contribution of VT300,000 to the
employees.
It was also urged upon
the Court, that in imposing the penalties, the Court must consider that Port
Vila Presse is the second Independent
Newspaper in Vanuatu. It employs 10
Ni-Vanuatu and lots of young boys and girls who sell the newspapers on
Saturdays.
The trade balance of
the Presse shows that there is no benefit at the end of each month. It is said
for the defendant that if a substantial
amount of fine is imposed, then, the
Port Vila Presse could be bankrupt. It is said for the defendant that the
offences are identical
and not isolated offences. The Court can then apply the
totality amount of fines. The defendant offered to pay VT200,000 per
month.
Offences in violation of
the provisions of the VNPF Act [CAP. 189] are serious
offences.
In the present case,
failing to register as an employer of the five employees, failing to register
the employees as employees and
failing to pay VNPF contributions to the fund in
favour of each of the said employees to the fund are not only serious but
dishonest
offences.
This has been
going on for a period of some 18 months. In count 1, the defendant is to pay a
fine of VT50,000 and 3 months imprisonment
suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
In counts 29 to 45,
the defendant is to pay at the rate of VT20,000 fine per count which is
totalling VT320,000 and 3 months imprisonment
suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
In counts 46 to 78,
the defendant is to pay at the rate of 20,000 VT fine per count which is
totalling VT640,000 and 3 months imprisonment
suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
In Count 151 to 182,
the defendant is to pay at the rate of 10,000 Vatu fine per count which is
totalling VT310,000 and 2 months imprisonment
suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
In counts 183 to 212,
the defendant is to pay at a rate of 10,000 VT fine per count which is totalling
VT290,000 and 2 months imprisonment
suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
In counts 213 to 234,
the defendant is to pay at the rate of 20,000 Vatu fine per count which is
totalling VT420,000 and 3 months
imprisonment suspended for 2 years
concurrent.
The prosecution is
entitled to the costs of
VT250,000.
The defendant is to
pay:
776,980 VT for contributions and surcharges
2,030,000 VT for the fines
250,000 VT for prosecution costs
___________
3,056,980 VT TOTALS
==========
The
payment shall be made as
follows:
1. VNPF contributions and
surcharges of VT 776,980 as follows:
The defendant is to pay 76,980 Vatu for the surcharge to the VNPF within 7 days.
700,000 Vatu balance is to be paid at the rate of VT200,000 per month until final settlement of that sum.
Fine
and costs
The fines and costs are
totalling VT2,280,000. The defendant is to pay VT200,000 per month to start
after final settlement of the
VNPF contributions until final settlement of the
payment of fines and costs or 6 months imprisonment in
default.
The defendant shall not
leave Vanuatu until fines and costs are
paid.
I order the passport of the
defendant to be surrendered to this Court by the date of this Order until
expiration of the defendant’s
sentence. No further application by the
defendant for a new passport. Liberty to apply subject to sufficient notice to
the other
side.
DATED at
Port-Vila this
5th
day of August 2003
BY
THE
COURT
Vincent
LUNABEK
Chief
Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/47.html