![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Criminal
Jurisdiction)
CRIMINAL CASE No. 01
of
2001
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR
-v-
HOLLINGSON
ISSACHAR
The Public Prosecutor, Mr.
Nicholas Mirou
Mr. Hillary Toa for the
defendant
RULING
This is an application by
the Public Prosecutor dated 9 June 2003 to have the matter re-listed in the
Supreme Court, for the Enforcement
of the Court Order issued on 11 February
2002.
The application was
re-listed on 15 July 2003.
It was
subsequently adjourned and dealt with on 25 July, 31 July 2003 and finally on 1
August 2003.
The Court was urged
upon by the prosecution to enforce the Court Orders made by the Supreme Court on
11 February 2002 by Marum J.
I set out the Orders for ease of
reference.
“I therefore make the following Orders:
1. The defendant is convicted and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
2. The two years imprisonment shall not be executed for a period of three months on the following conditions:-
(a) that the defendant shall repay the amount VT511,846 to the South Pentecost Community, through Emile Boule within 3 months from today. If the defendant does not pay the total amount of VT511,846 plus costs that to be ordered, he shall serve his two years imprisonment;
(b) If the defendant pay VT511,846 plus costs that to be ordered, then the defendant’s sentence of two years be suspended for two years on condition that the defendant within the period of two years shall not be convicted of any offence. If he does, then he shall serve his 2 years imprisonment. If he does not then he shall be discharged upon these Orders.
3. ...
Dated at Port-Vila, this 11th day of February 2002
R. Marum MBE
Judge.”
However,
by careful reading and perusal of the conditions of suspended custodial sentence
of two (2) years, with regard to payment
of vatu 511,846 including costs of Vatu
61,200 and in the light of the provisions of the Suspension of Sentence Act
[CAP. 67], the
Court enquires and questions the lawfulness of the Order 2(a) and
2(b) above.
The Public Prosecutor
is, therefore, advised to lodge an appeal against the Court Order of 11 February
2002.
The enforcement of these
Orders is stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. Further orders made by this
Court orally on 31 July 2003
are also
suspended.
Dated
at Port-Vila this
1st
day of August 2003
BY
THE
COURT
Vincent
LUNABEK
Chief
Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/46.html