![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME COURT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF
VANUATU
(Criminal
Jurisdiction)
Criminal Case No. 11 of 2002
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
v
NOEL
FAENOLAVE
ALFRED
MASENG
ALFRED
MALIU
Coram: Mr Justice Oliver
A. Saksak
Counsel: Ms Linnes Moli
for the Public Prosecutor
Mr Daniel
Yawha for the Defendants
Date:
Thursday
3rd
April, 2003.
SENTENCE
Based on the evidence
presented to the Court, the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that
the three defendants are guilty
of the following
offences:-
1.
Noel Faenolave
Count 1 - Charged for false pretence under section 125(c) of the Penal Code Act [CAP.135] (the Act)
Count 2 - Theft under section 125(a) of the Act.
Count 4 - Misappropriation under section 125(b) of the Act.
Count 8 - Theft, section 125(a).
Count 9 - Misappropriation, section 125(b).
2.
Alfred Maseng
Count 5 - Aiding and abetting Misappropriation under sections 30 and 125(b) of the Act.
Count 7 - Receiving property dishonestly under section 131 of the Act.
Count 10 - Aiding and abetting Misappropriation under sections 30 and 125(b) of the Act.
3.
Alfred Maliu
Count 3 - Charged with aiding and abetting Misappropriation under sections 30 and 125(b) of the Act.
The
Court therefore convicts all three defendants in respect of the charges against
each of them.
In sentencing the
defendants I disregard their past record of previous convictions. Noel
Faenolave's last conviction was for forgery
in August 1995 for which he was
fined VT10.000 and paid VT5.000 in costs. Alfred Maseng's last conviction was in
1989 for intentional
assault for which he was fined VT2.000. Alfred Maliu has a
long history of convictions back to 1980. His last conviction was in March
1994
in relation to a traffic
offence.
I take into account the
fact that all three defendants are the sole bread-winners in and for their
respective families. That they
each support their children at schools and other
relatives' children to attend schools in Vanuatu. I take into account the
contributions
each of the defendants has made towards the political, social and
economic developments of Vanuatu. They each hold reputable positions
in the
community. I take into account the ages of Alfred Maseng and Alfred Maliu and
the physical health of Alfred
Maliu.
It is with regret and
misfortune that these leaders should allow their reputations to be marred by the
commission of these criminal
offences.
The aggravating factors
that the Court takes into account to impose jail terms and a heavy fine is the
fact that Noel Faenolave and
Alfred Maliu as Chairman and Ex-Officio member of
the VCMB, had abused their positions of trust. To deter others from so acting,
the Court is of the view that terms of imprisonment should be imposed on Noel
Faenolave and Alfred Maseng. However those jail terms
should be suspended. For
Alfred Maliu, the Court is of the view that a rather heavy fine should suffice.
Accordingly the Court imposes
the following
sentences.
1. On Alfred Maliu
-
Count 3 - For aiding and abetting misappropriation, he is sentenced to pay a fine of VT30.000 to be paid within 14 days from today or in default, imprisonment for 2 months.
2.
On Alfred Maseng -
Count 5 - For aiding and abetting misappropriation - 2 months imprisonment.
Count 7 - For receiving property dishonestly - 1 month imprisonment to run concurrently with count 5 making a total of 2 months.
Count 10 - For aiding and abetting misappropriation - 2 months imprisonment to be made consecutive to the sentences for Counts 5 & 7, making a total of 4 months imprisonment.
This
term of imprisonment is suspended for a period of 2 years from today. This
suspension is made under the provisions of the Suspension of Sentences Act [CAP.
67].
There will be a restitution
order against Alfred Maseng in respect of VT5.000 he admitted to receiving from
Noel Faenolave. He is
ordered to repay VT5.000 to Noel Takau, via the Court
Registry on or before
5th
April,
2003.
3.
Noel
Faenolave
-
|
On Count 1 -
|
For false
pretence-
|
4 months
imprisonment.
|
|
|
On Count 2 -
|
For theft -
|
4 months imprisonment
concurrent to Count 1.
|
|
|
On Count 4 -
|
For Misappropriation
-
|
4 months
concurrent.
|
|
|
|
Total = |
4 months
|
|
|
|
|||
|
On Count 8 -
|
For
theft -
|
5 months
|
|
|
On Count 9 -
|
Misappropriation
-
|
5 months
concurrent.
|
|
Total = |
5 months
|
|
|
|
|
|||
But I order that these 5
months be served consecutively with the 4 months for Counts 1, 2 & 4. These
thefts related to two incidents
committed in just one day apart. The Overall
total sentence for Noel Faenolave is 9 months imprisonment. Like Alfred Maseng,
this
term of imprisonment is suspended for 2
years.
There will be a restitution
order against Noel. He is ordered to repay the sum of VT81, 367 to Noel Takau
via the Court Registry.
Payments will be made in 2 instalments as
follows:-
(a) End of April, 2003 - VT40, 683.
(b) End of May, 2003 - VT40, 684.
Should
any of the defendants wish to appeal, you may do so within 14
days.
DATED at Luganville this 3rd day of April, 2003.
BY THE COURT
OLIVER
A.
SAKSAK
Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/135.html