![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Supreme Court of Vanuatu |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE SUPREME
COURT
OF THE
REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Civil
Jurisdiction)
Civil Case No. 17 of
2003
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
Appellant
AND:
ZEBEDDE
TANGA
First
Respondent
AND:
JOHN
PAKOA TARIMAS
Second
Respondent
JUDGMENT ON APPEAL
This is a civil action
following upon a road accident. After several adjournments the Magistrate heard
the trial on
19th
December. It was late in the day when the defendant/appellant’s witnesses
were called. They had been present earlier but had
left. The case was adjourned
to
20th
December. Counsel told them that morning to attend. They didn’t. One went
to his island for Christmas; the other went to a
funeral. They were both police
officers. One has since died.
On
20th,
the Magistrate refused any further adjournment and called for closing
submissions. The defendant appeals against the refusal. He
says the plaintiff
had had the benefit of several
adjournments.
I dismiss this
appeal. It was within the discretion of the Magistrate to act as he did. The
defence witnesses had been present on
19th
but just left. They didn’t attend on
20th,
despite being warned. They were police
officers.
The appellant will pay
the respondents assessed costs of VT10,000 by 3 p.m. on
18th
March.
Dated at
Port Vila, this
4th
day of March 2003.
R. J. COVENTRY
Judge.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2003/11.html