(New York, 15/11/2000)
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 25 December 2003, in accordance with article 17 which reads as follows: "1. This Protocol shall enter into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the fortieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, except that it shall not enter into force before the entry into force of the Convention. For the purpose of this paragraph, any instrument deposited by a regional economic integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by member States of such organization. 2. For each State or regional economic integration organization ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to this Protocol after the deposit of the fortieth instrument of such action, this Protocol shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date of deposit by such State or organization of the relevant instrument or on the date this Protocol enters into force pursuant to paragraph 1 of this article, whichever is the later."
Depositary: N/A
Parties | Date of Signature | Date of ratification / Other | Entry Into Force | Domestication Legislation (where available) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kiribati |   | 15 Sep 2005 a |   |   |
Nauru | 12 Nov 2001 |   |   |   |
Albania | 12 Dec 2000 | 21 Aug 2002 |   |   |
Algeria [#] | 6 Jun 2001 | 9 Mar 2004 |   |   |
Argentina | 12 Dec 2000 | 19 Nov 2002 |   |   |
Armenia | 15 Nov 2001 | 1 Jul 2003 |   |   |
Australia [#] | 11 Dec 2002 | 14 Sep 2005 |   |   |
Austria | 12 Dec 2000 | 15 Sep 2005 |   |   |
Azerbaijan [#] | 12 Dec 2000 | 30 Oct 2003 |   |   |
Bahamas | 9 Apr 2001 |   |   |   |
Bahrain [#] |   | 7 Jun 2004 a |   |   |
Barbados | 26 Sep 2001 |   |   |   |
Belarus | 14 Dec 2000 | 25 Jun 2003 |   |   |
Belgium [#] | 12 Dec 2000 | 11 Aug 2004 |   |   |
Belize |   | 26 Sep 2003 a |   |   |
Benin | 13 Dec 2000 | 30 Aug 2004 |   |   |
Bolivia [#] | 12 Dec 2000 | 18 May 2006 |   |   |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 12 Dec 2000 | 24 Apr 2002 |   |   |
Botswana | 10 Apr 2002 | 29 Aug 2002 |   |   |
Brazil | 12 Dec 2000 | 29 Jan 2004 |   |   |
Bulgaria | 13 Dec 2000 | 5 Dec 2001 |   |   |
Burkina Faso | 15 Dec 2000 | 15 May 2002 |   |   |
Burundi | 14 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Cambodia | 11 Nov 2001 | 2 Jul 2007 |   |   |
Cameroon | 13 Dec 2000 | 6 Feb 2006 |   |   |
Canada | 14 Dec 2000 | 13 May 2002 |   |   |
Cape Verde | 13 Dec 2000 | 15 Jul 2004 |   |   |
Central African Republic |   | 6 Oct 2006 a |   |   |
Chile | 8 Aug 2002 | 29 Nov 2004 |   |   |
Colombia [#] | 12 Dec 2000 | 4 Aug 2004 |   |   |
Congo | 14 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Costa Rica | 16 Mar 2001 | 9 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Croatia | 12 Dec 2000 | 24 Jan 2003 |   |   |
Cyprus | 12 Dec 2000 | 6 Aug 2003 |   |   |
Czech Republic | 10 Dec 2002 |   |   |   |
Democratic Republic of the Congo |   | 28 Oct 2005 a |   |   |
Denmark | 12 Dec 2000 | 30 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Djibouti |   | 20 Apr 2005 a |   |   |
Dominican Republic | 15 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Ecuador [#] | 13 Dec 2000 | 17 Sep 2002 |   |   |
Egypt | 1 May 2002 | 5 Mar 2004 |   |   |
El Salvador [#] | 15 Aug 2002 | 18 Mar 2004 |   |   |
Equatorial Guinea | 14 Dec 2000 | 7 Feb 2003 |   |   |
Estonia | 20 Sep 2002 | 12 May 2004 |   |   |
European Community [#] | 12 Dec 2000 | 6 Sep 2006 AA |   |   |
Finland | 12 Dec 2000 | 7 Sep 2006 A |   |   |
France | 12 Dec 2000 | 29 Oct 2002 |   |   |
Gambia | 14 Dec 2000 | 5 May 2003 |   |   |
Georgia | 13 Dec 2000 | 5 Sep 2006 |   |   |
Germany | 12 Dec 2000 | 14 Jun 2006 |   |   |
Greece | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Grenada |   | 21 May 2004 a |   |   |
Guatemala |   | 1 Apr 2004 a |   |   |
Guinea |   | 9 Nov 2004 a |   |   |
Guinea-Bissau | 14 Dec 2000 | 10 Sep 2007 |   |   |
Guyana |   | 14 Sep 2004 a |   |   |
Haiti | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Hungary | 14 Dec 2000 | 22 Dec 2006 |   |   |
Iceland | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
India | 12 Dec 2002 |   |   |   |
Indonesia | 12 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Ireland | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Israel | 14 Nov 2001 |   |   |   |
Italy | 12 Dec 2000 | 2 Aug 2006 |   |   |
Jamaica | 13 Feb 2002 | 29 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Japan | 9 Dec 2002 |   |   |   |
Kenya |   | 5 Jan 2005 a |   |   |
Kuwait |   | 12 May 2006 a |   |   |
Kyrgyzstan | 13 Dec 2000 | 2 Oct 2003 |   |   |
Lao People's Democratic Republic [#] |   | 26 Sep 2003 a |   |   |
Latvia | 10 Dec 2002 | 25 May 2004 |   |   |
Lebanon | 9 Dec 2002 | 5 Oct 2005 |   |   |
Lesotho | 14 Dec 2000 | 24 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Liberia |   | 22 Sep 2004 a |   |   |
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya | 13 Nov 2001 | 24 Sep 2004 |   |   |
Liechtenstein | 14 Mar 2001 |   |   |   |
Lithuania [#] | 25 Apr 2002 | 23 Jun 2003 |   |   |
Luxembourg | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Madagascar | 14 Dec 2000 | 15 Sep 2005 |   |   |
Malawi [#] |   | 17 Mar 2005 a |   |   |
Mali | 15 Dec 2000 | 12 Apr 2002 |   |   |
Malta | 14 Dec 2000 | 24 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Mauritania |   | 22 Jul 2005 a |   |   |
Mauritius |   | 24 Sep 2003 a |   |   |
Mexico | 13 Dec 2000 | 4 Mar 2003 |   |   |
Moldova [#] | 14 Dec 2000 | 16 Sep 2005 |   |   |
Monaco | 13 Dec 2000 | 5 Jun 2001 |   |   |
Montenegro |   | 23 Oct 2006 d |   |   |
Mozambique | 15 Dec 2000 | 20 Sep 2006 |   |   |
Myanmar [#] |   | 30 Mar 2004 a |   |   |
Namibia | 13 Dec 2000 | 16 Aug 2002 |   |   |
Netherlands | 12 Dec 2000 | 27 Jul 2005 A |   |   |
New Zealand | 14 Dec 2000 | 19 Jul 2002 |   |   |
Nicaragua |   | 12 Oct 2004 a |   |   |
Niger | 21 Aug 2001 | 30 Sep 2004 |   |   |
Nigeria | 13 Dec 2000 | 28 Jun 2001 |   |   |
Norway | 13 Dec 2000 | 23 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Oman |   | 13 May 2005 a |   |   |
Panama | 13 Dec 2000 | 18 Aug 2004 |   |   |
Paraguay | 12 Dec 2000 | 22 Sep 2004 |   |   |
Peru | 14 Dec 2000 | 23 Jan 2002 |   |   |
Philippines | 14 Dec 2000 | 28 May 2002 |   |   |
Poland | 4 Oct 2001 | 26 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Portugal | 12 Dec 2000 | 10 May 2004 |   |   |
Republic of Korea | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Romania | 14 Dec 2000 | 4 Dec 2002 |   |   |
Russian Federation | 12 Dec 2000 | 26 May 2004 |   |   |
Rwanda | 14 Dec 2000 | 26 Sep 2003 |   |   |
Saint Kitts and Nevis |   | 21 May 2004 a |   |   |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 20 Nov 2002 |   |   |   |
San Marino | 14 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Sao Tome and Principe |   | 23 Aug 2006 a |   |   |
Saudi Arabia [#] | 10 Dec 2002 | 20 Jul 2007 |   |   |
Senegal | 13 Dec 2000 | 27 Oct 2003 |   |   |
Serbia | 12 Dec 2000 | 6 Sep 2001 |   |   |
Seychelles | 22 Jul 2002 | 22 Jun 2004 |   |   |
Sierra Leone | 27 Nov 2001 |   |   |   |
Slovakia | 15 Nov 2001 | 21 Sep 2004 |   |   |
Slovenia | 15 Nov 2001 | 21 May 2004 |   |   |
South Africa [#] | 14 Dec 2000 | 20 Feb 2004 |   |   |
Spain | 13 Dec 2000 | 1 Mar 2002 |   |   |
Sri Lanka | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Suriname |   | 25 May 2007 a |   |   |
Swaziland | 8 Jan 2001 |   |   |   |
Sweden | 12 Dec 2000 | 1 Jul 2004 |   |   |
Switzerland | 2 Apr 2002 | 27 Oct 2006 |   |   |
Syrian Arab Republic | 13 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Tajikistan |   | 8 Jul 2002 a |   |   |
Thailand | 18 Dec 2001 |   |   |   |
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | 12 Dec 2000 | 12 Jan 2005 |   |   |
Togo | 12 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Trinidad and Tobago | 26 Sep 2001 | 6 Nov 2007 |   |   |
Tunisia [#] | 13 Dec 2000 | 14 Jul 2003 |   |   |
Turkey | 13 Dec 2000 | 25 Mar 2003 |   |   |
Turkmenistan |   | 28 Mar 2005 a |   |   |
Uganda | 12 Dec 2000 |   |   |   |
Ukraine | 15 Nov 2001 | 21 May 2004 |   |   |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 14 Dec 2000 | 9 Feb 2006 |   |   |
United Republic of Tanzania | 13 Dec 2000 | 24 May 2006 |   |   |
United States of America [#] | 13 Dec 2000 | 3 Nov 2005 |   |   |
Uruguay | 13 Dec 2000 | 4 Mar 2005 |   |   |
Uzbekistan | 28 Jun 2001 |   |   |   |
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) | 14 Dec 2000 | 13 May 2002 |   |   |
Zambia |   | 24 Apr 2005 a |   |   |
|
|
DECLARATIONS
Declarations and Reservations
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.)
Reservations
The Government of the Algerian People's Democratic Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 15, paragraph 2, of this Protocol, which provides that any dispute between two or more States concerning the interpretation or application of the said Protocol that cannot be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States, be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice
The Government of the Algerian People's Democratic Republic believes that any dispute of this kind can only be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice with the consent of all parties to the dispute
Declarations
Ratification of this Protocol by the Algerian People's Democratic Republic in no way signifies recognition of Israel
Such ratification cannot be construed as leading to the establishment of any kind of relations with Israel
Declaration made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification
The Government of Australia hereby declares that nothing in the Protocol shall be seen to be imposing obligations on Australia to admit or retain within its borders persons in respect of whom Australia would not otherwise have an obligation to admit or retain within its borders.
Azerbaijan [up]
Declaration
The Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it is unable to guarantee the application of the provisions of the Protocol in the territories occupied by the Republic of Armenia until these territories are liberated from that occupation.
Reservation
In accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 15 of the Protocol, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 15.
Reservation
... the Kingdom of Bahrain does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of article 15 of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children.
Upon signature
Declaration
The French, Flemish and German-speaking Communities and the Regions of Wallonia, Flanders and Brussels-Capital are also bound by this signature
Declaration
The Republic of Bolivia declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 15, which deals with the settlement of disputes concerning this Protocol
Reservation
In accordance with article 15, paragraph 3, of the Protocol, Colombia declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of that article
Reservation
Exercising the powers referred to in article 15, paragraph 3, of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, the Government of Ecuador makes a reservation with regard to article 15, paragraph 2, relating to the settlement of disputes
Upon signature
Reservation
The Government of the Republic of El Salvador does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of article 15, inasmuch as it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
Upon ratification
Reservation
With respect to the provisions of article 15, paragraph 3, the Government of the Republic of El Salvador declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 15, paragraph 2, inasmuch as it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
Declaration
Article 16 (3) of the Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, provides that the instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval of a regional economic integration organisation shall contain a declaration specifying the matters governed by the Protocol in respect of which competence has been transferred to the organisation by its Member States which are Parties to the Protocol
The Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, shall apply, with regard to the competences transferred to the European Community, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty, in particular Article 299 thereof and the Protocols annexed to it
This declaration is without prejudice to the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland under the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union and under the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community
This declaration is equally without prejudice to the position of Denmark under the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community
Pursuant to Article 299, this declaration is also not applicable to the territories of the Member States in which the said Treaty does not apply and is without prejudice to such acts or positions as may be adopted under the Protocol by the Member States concerned on behalf of and in the interests of those territories. In accordance with the provision referred to above, this declaration indicates the competence that the Member States have transferred to the Community under the Treaties in matters governed by the Protocol. The scope and the exercise of such Community competence are, by their nature, subject to continuous development as the Community further adopts relevant rules and regulations, and the Community will complete or amend this declaration, if necessary, in accordance with Article 16 (3) of the Protocol
The Community points out that it has competence with regard to the crossing of external borders of the Member States, regulating standards and procedures when carrying out checks on persons at such borders and rules on visas for intended stays of no more than three months
The Community is also competent for measures on immigration policy regarding conditions of entry and residence and measures to counter illegal immigration and illegal residence, including repatriation of illegal residents. Moreover, it can take measures to ensure cooperation between the relevant departments of the administrations of the Member States, as well as between those departments and the Commission, in the aforementioned areas. In these fields the Community has adopted rules and regulations and, where it has done so, it is hence solely for the Community to enter into external undertakings with third States or competent international organisations
In addition, Community policy in the sphere of development cooperation complements policies pursued by Member States and includes provisions to prevent and combat trafficking in persons.
Lao People's Democratic Republic [up]
Reservation
In accordance with paragraph 3, Article 15 of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, the Lao People's Democratic Republic does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2, Article 15 of the present Protocol. The Lao People's Democratic Republic declares that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the present Protocol to arbitration or [the] International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute is necessary.
Reservation
AND WHEREAS, it is provided in paragraph 3 of Article 15 of the Protocol, the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania would like to declare that the Republic of Lithuania does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 15, which provides that any State Party may refer any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the said Protocol to the International Court of Justice.
Declarations
The Government of the Republic of Malawi in its efforts to curb and stamp out offences related to trafficking in persons especially women and children has embarked upon various social and legal reforms to incorporate obligations emanating from this Protocol (Article 16 (4))
Further, declares expressly its acceptance of Article 15 (2) on settlement of disputes concerning interpretation and application of this Protocol
The Competent Authority charged with the responsibility of coordinating and rendering of mutual legal assistance is
The Principal Secretary
Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security
Private Bag 331, Lilongwe 3. MALAWI
Fax: 265 1 789509 Tel: 265 1 789 177
The Official Language of communication is English.
Reservation and declaration
In accordance with paragraph 3 of article 15 of the Protocol, the Republic of Moldova does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of article 15 of the Protocol
Until the full establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Protocol will be applied only on the territory controlled by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova
Reservation
The Government of the Union of Myanmar wishes to express reservation on Article 20 and does not consider itself bound by obligations to refer disputes relating to the interpretation or application of this Protocol to the International Court of Justice.
Upon signature
Declaration and reservation
The public order of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia prohibits trafficking in persons for the purpose referred to in paragraph (a) of Article 3 of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children
The Kingdom does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 15 of the said Protocol. It makes reservations regarding the contents of paragraph 3d of Article Six and paragraph 1 of Article 7 of the said protocol
Reservation upon ratification
... the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not consider itself obligated to paragraph 2 of article 15 of the Protocol
Reservation
AND WHEREAS pending a decision by the Government of the Republic of South Africa on the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, the Government of the Republic does not consider itself bound by the terms of Article 15 (2) of the Protocol which provides for the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in differences arising out of the interpretation or application of the Protocol. The Republic will adhere to the position that, for the submission of a particular dispute for settlement by the International Court, the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in every individual case.
Reservation
In ratifying the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 15 November 2000, declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 15, paragraph 2, of the Protocol and affirms that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Protocol may be referred to the International Court of Justice only after it has given its prior consent
Reservations
(1) The United States of America reserves the right not to apply in part the obligation set forth in Article 15, paragraph 1 (b), of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime with respect to the offenses established in the Trafficking Protocol. The United States does not provide for plenary jurisdiction over offenses that are committed on board ships flying its flag or aircraft registered under its laws. However, in a number of circumstances, U.S. law provides for jurisdiction over such offenses committed on board U.S. - flagged ships or aircraft registered under U.S. law. Accordingly, the United States will implement paragraph 1 (b) of the Convention to the extent provided for under its federal law
(2) The United States of America reserves the right to assume obligations under this Protocol in a manner consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism, pursuant to which both federal and state criminal laws must be considered in relation to conduct addressed in the Protocol. U.S. federal criminal law, which regulates conduct based on its effect on interstate or foreign commerce, or another federal interest, such as the Thirteen Amendment's prohibition of "slavery" and "involuntary servitude," serves as the principal legal regime within the United States for combating the conduct addressed in this Protocol, and is broadly effective for this purpose. Federal criminal law does not apply in the rare case where such criminal conduct does not so involve interstate or foreign commerce, or otherwise implicate another federal interest, such as the Thirteenth Amendment. There are a small number of conceivable situations involving such rare offenses of a purely local character where U.S. federal and state criminal law may not be entirely adequate to satisfy an obligation under the Protocol. The United States of America therefore reserves to the obligations set forth in the Protocol to the extent they address conduct which would fall within this narrow category of highly localized activity. This reservation does not affect in any respect the ability of the United States to provide international cooperation to other Parties as contemplated in the Protocol
(3) In accordance with Article 15, paragraph 3, the United States of America declares that it does not consider itself bound by the obligation set forth in Article 15, paragraph 2.
Understanding
The United States of America understands the obligation to establish the offenses in the Protocol as money laundering predicate offenses, in light of Article 6, paragraph 2 (b) of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, as requiring States Parties whose money laundering legislation sets forth a list of specific predicate offenses to include in such list a comprehensive range of offenses associated with trafficking in persons.
NOTES
1. With a territorial exclusion in respect of the Faroe Islands and Greenland
2. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume
3. For the Kingdom in Europe. On 18 January 2007 : extension to Aruba
4. With the following territorial exclusion
.....consistent with the constitutional status of Tokelau and taking into account the commitment of the Government of New Zealand to the development of self-government for Tokelau through an act of self-determination under the Charter of the United Nations, this ratification shall not extend to Tokelau unless and until a Declaration to this effect is lodged by the Government of New Zealand with the Depositary on the basis of appropriate consultation with that territory.....
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/pits/en/status_pages/2000-20.html