![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
Nauru Sessional Legislation |
REPUBLIC OF NAURU
(No. 17 of 1972)
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
PART I
PRELIMINARY
Section
1. Short title
2. Interpretation
PART II
HEARSAY EVIDENCE
3. Hearsay evidence to be admissible only by virtue of this Act or other
statutory provisions, or by agreement
4. Admissibility of out-of-court
statements as evidence of facts stated
5. Witness's previous statement, if
proved, to be evidence of facts stated
6. Admissibility of certain records as
evidence of facts stated
7. Admissibility of statements produced by
computers
8. Provisions supplementary to sections 4 to 7
9. Admissibility
of evidence of credibility of maker, etc., of statement admitted under section 4
or section 6
10. Rules of court
11. Admissibility of certain hearsay
evidence formerly admissible under the common law of England as adopted
PART III
MISCELLANEOUS
12. Convictions as evidence in civil proceedings
13. Findings of
adultery and paternity as evidence in civil proceedings
14. Conclusiveness of
convictions for purpose of defamation actions
15. Privilege against
incrimination of self or spouse
16. Abolition of certain privileges
17.
Consequential amendments relating to privilege
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AN ACT
To amend the law of evidence in relation to civil proceedings, and in respect of the privilege against self-incrimination to make corresponding amendments in relation to statutory powers of inspection or investigation.
(Certified: 14th September, 1972)
Enacted by the Parliament of Nauru as follows:
PART I - PRELIMINARY
SHORT TITLE AND COMMENCEMENT
1. This Act may be
cited as the Civil Evidence Act 1972 and shall come into force on a date to be
notified by the Minister in the
Gazette.
INTERPRETATION
2. (1) In this Act "civil
proceedings" includes, in addition to civil proceedings in any of the Courts
-
(a) civil proceedings before any other tribunal, being proceedings in relation to which the strict rules of evidence apply; and
(b) an arbitration or reference, whether under a written law or not,
but does not include civil proceedings in relation to
which the strict rules of evidence do not apply; and, for the purposes of the
application of Part II of this Act in relation to any such arbitration or
reference, any rules of court made for the purposes of
this Act shall, except
insofar as their operation is excluded by agreement, apply, subject to such
modifications as may be appropriate,
in like manner as they apply in relation to
civil proceedings in the Supreme Court. If any questions arises as to what are,
for the
purposes of any such arbitration or reference, the appropriate
modifications of any such rule of court, that question shall, in default
of
agreement, be determined by the tribunal or the arbitrator or umpire, as the
case may be.
(2) In this Act -
"Court", in relation to an arbitration or reference, means the arbitrator or umpire and, in relation to proceedings before a tribunal, not being one of the ordinary courts of law, means the tribunal;
"legal proceedings" includes an arbitration or reference, whether under an enactment or not;
and for the avoidance of doubt it is hereby
declared that in this Act, and in any amendment made by this Act in any other
enactment,
references to a person's husband or wife do not include references to
a person who is no longer married to that person.
(3) In Part II of this
Act -
"computer" has the meaning assigned by section 7 of this Act;
"document" includes, in addition to a document in writing -
(a) any map, plan, graph or drawing;
(b) any photograph;
(c) any disc, tape, soundtrack or other device in which sounds or other data, not being visual images, are embodied so as to be capable, with or without the aid of some other equipment, of being reproduced therefrom; and
(d) any film, negative, tape or other device in which one or more visual images are embodied so as to be capable, as aforesaid, of being reproduced therefrom;
"film" includes a microfilm;
"statement'" includes any representation of fact, whether made in words or otherwise.
(4) In Part II of this Act any reference to a copy
of a document includes -
(a) in the case of a document falling within paragraph (c) but not (d) of the definition of "document" in the preceding subsection, a transcript of the sounds or other data embodied therein;
(b) in the case of a document falling within paragraph (d) but not (c) of that definition, a reproduction or still reproduction of the image or images embodied therein, whether enlarged or not;
(c) in the case of a document falling within both those paragraphs, such a transcript together with such a still reproduction; and
(d) in the case of a document not falling within the said paragraph (d) of which a visual image is embodied in a document falling within that paragraph, a reproduction of that image, whether enlarged or not,
and any
reference to a copy of the material part of a document shall be construed
accordingly.
(5) Any reference in this Act to any other written law
includes a reference thereto as applied by or under any other written
law.
(6) Nothing in this Act shall prejudice the operation of any written
law which provides, in whatever words, that any answer or evidence
given by a
person in specified circumstances shall not be admissible in evidence against
him or some other person in any proceedings
or class of proceedings, however
described.
In this subsection the reference to giving evidence is a
reference to giving evidence in any manner, whether by furnishing information,
making discovery, producing documents or otherwise.
(7) Nothing in this
Act shall prejudice -
(a) any power of a Court, in any legal proceedings, to exclude evidence, whether by preventing questions from being put or otherwise, at its discretion; or
(b) the operation of any agreement, whenever made, between the parties to any legal proceedings as to the evidence which is to be admissible, whether generally or for any particular purpose, in those proceedings.
(8) It is hereby declared that where, by reason
of any defect of speech or hearing from which he is suffering, a person called
as
a witness in any legal proceedings gives his evidence in writing or by signs,
that evidence is to be treated for the purposes of
this Act as being given
orally.
PART II - HEARSAY EVIDENCE
HEARSAY EVIDENCE TO BE ADMISSIBLE ONLY BY VIRTUE OF THIS ACT OR OTHER
STATUTORY PROVISIONS, OR BY AGREEMENT
3. (1) In any civil
proceedings a statement other than one made by a person while giving oral
evidence in those proceedings shall be
admissible as evidence of any fact stated
therein to the extent that it is so admissible by virtue of any provision of
this Part
of this Act or by virtue of any other statutory provision or by
agreement of the parties, but not otherwise.
(2) In this section
"statutory provision" means any provision contained in, or in an instrument made
under, any written law.
ADMISSIBILITY OF OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS AS
EVIDENCE OF FACTS STATED
4. (1) In any civil proceedings a
statement made, whether orally or in a document or otherwise, by any person,
whether called as a
witness in those proceedings or not, shall, subject to this
section and to rules of court, be admissible as evidence of any fact
stated
therein of which direct oral evidence by him would be admissible.
(2)
Where in any civil proceedings a party desiring to give a statement in evidence
by virtue of this section has called or intends
to call as a witness in the
proceedings the person by whom the statement was made, the statement -
(a) shall not be given in evidence by virtue of this section on behalf of that party without the leave of the Court; and
(b) without prejudice to paragraph (a), shall not be given in evidence by virtue of this section on behalf of that party before the conclusion of the examination-in-chief of the person by whom it was made, except -
(i) where, before that person is called, the Court allows evidence of the making of the statement to be given on behalf of that party by some other person; or
(ii) in so far as the Court allows the person by whom the statement was made to narrate it in the course of his examination-in-chief on the ground that to prevent him from doing so would adversely affect the intelligibility of his evidence.
(3) Where in any civil proceedings a
statement which was made otherwise than in a document is admissible by virtue of
this section,
no evidence other than direct oral evidence by the person who made
the statement or any person who heard or otherwise perceived it
being made shall
be admissible for the purpose of proving it:
Provided that if the
statement in question was made by a person while giving oral evidence in some
other legal proceedings, whether
civil or criminal, it may be proved in any
manner authorised by the Court.
WITNESS'S PREVIOUS STATEMENT, IF
PROVED, TO BE EVIDENCE OF FACTS STATED
5. (1) Where in any
civil proceedings -
(a) a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness in those proceedings is proved by virtue of any of sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 of England, an adopted statute; or
(b) a previous statement named by a person called as aforesaid is proved for the purpose of rebutting a suggestion that his evidence has been fabricated;
that statement shall by virtue of this subsection
be admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral
evidence
by him would be admissible.
(2) Nothing in this Act shall affect
any of the rules of law relating to the circumstances in which, where a person
called as a witness
in any civil proceedings is cross-examined on a document
used by him to refresh his memory, that document may be made evidence in
those
proceedings; and where a document or any part of a document is received in
evidence in any such proceedings by virtue of any
such rule of law, any
statement made in that document or part by the person using the document to
refresh his memory shall by virtue
of this subsection be admissible as evidence
of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence by him would be
admissible.
ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN RECORDS AS EVIDENCE OF FACTS
STATED
6. (1) Without prejudice to section 7 of this Act, in
any civil proceedings a statement contained in a document shall, subject to this
section and to rules of court, be admissible as evidence of any fact stated
therein of which direct oral evidence would be admissible,
if the document is,
or forms part of, a record compiled by a person acting under duty from
information which was supplied by a person,
whether acting under a duty or not,
who had, or may reasonably be supposed to have had, personal knowledge of the
matters dealt with
in that information and which, if not supplied by that person
to the compiler of the record directly, was supplied by him to the
compiler of
the record indirectly through one or more intermediaries each acting under a
duty.
(2) Where in any proceedings a party desiring to give a statement
in evidence by virtue of this section has called or intends to call
as a witness
in the proceedings the person who originally supplied the information from which
the record containing the statement
was compiled the statement -
(a) shall not be given in evidence by virtue of this section on behalf of that party without
the leave of the Court; and
(b) without prejudice to paragraph (a), shall not without the leave of the Court be given in evidence by virtue of this section on behalf of that party before the conclusion of the examination-in-chief of the person who originally supplied the said information.
(3) Any reference in this section to a
person acting under a duty includes a reference to a person acting in the course
of any trade,
business, profession or other occupation in which he is engaged or
employed or for the purposes of any paid or unpaid office held
by
him.
ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS PRODUCED BY
COMPUTERS
7. (1) In any civil proceedings a statement
contained in a document produced by a computer shall, subject to rules of court,
be admissible
as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral
evidence would be admissible, if it is shown that the conditions, mentioned
in
subsection (2) are satisfied in relation to the statement and computer in
question.
(2) The said conditions are -
(a) that the document containing the statement was produced by the computer during a period over which the computer was used regularly in Nauru or elsewhere to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period, whether for profit or not, by any body, whether corporate or not, or by any individual;
(b) that over that period there was regularly supplied to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities information of the kind contained in the statement or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived;
(c) that throughout the material part of that period the computer was operating properly or, if not, that any respect in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of that period was not such as to affect the production of the document or the accuracy of its contents; and
(d) that the information contained in the statement reproduces or is derived from information supplied to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities.
(3) Where over a period the function of storing
or processing information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried
on
over that period as mentioned in paragraph (a) of subsection (2) was
regularly performed by computers, whether -
(a) by a combination of computers operating over that period;
(b) by different computers operating in succession over that period;
(c) by different combinations of computers operating in succession over that period; or
(d) in any other manner involving the successive operation over that period, in whatever order, of one or more computers and one or more combinations of computers,
all the computers used for that purpose during
that period shall be treated for the purposes of this Part of this Act as
constituting
a single computer; and references in this Part of this Act to a
computer shall be construed accordingly.
(4) in any civil proceedings
where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a
certificate doing any
of the following things, that is to say -
(a) identifying the document containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;
(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that document as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the document was produced by a computer;
(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in subsection (2) relate,
and purporting to be signed by a
person occupying a responsible position in relation to the operation of the
relevant device or the
management of the relevant activities, whichever is
appropriate, shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for
the purposes of this subsection it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated
to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person
stating it.
(5) For
the purposes of this Part of this Act -
(a) information shall be taken to be supplied to a computer if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly or, with or without human intervention, by means of any appropriate equipment;
(b) where, in the course of activities carried on by any individual or body, information is supplied with a view to its being stored or processed for those purposes of those activities by a computer operated otherwise than in the course of those activities, that information, if duly supplied to that computer, shall be taken to be supplied to it in the course of those activities;
(c) a document shall be taken to have been produced by a computer whether it was produced by it directly or, with or without human intervention, by means of any appropriate equipment.
(6) Subject to subsection (3), in this
Part of this Act "computer" means any device for storing and processing
information, and any
reference to information being derived from other
information is a reference to its being derived therefrom by calculation,
comparison
or any other process.
PROVISIONS SUPPLEMENTARY TO SECTIONS
4 TO 7
8. (1) Where in any civil proceedings a statement
contained in a document is proposed to be given in evidence by virtue of any of
sections
4, 6 and 7 of this Act, it may, subject to any rules of court, be
proved by the production of that document or, whether or not that
document is
still in existence, by the production of a copy of that document, or of the
material part thereof, authenticated in such
manner as the Court may
approve.
(2) For the purpose of deciding whether or not a statement is
admissible in evidence by virtue of any of sections 4, 6 and 7 of this
Act, the
Court may draw any reasonable inference from the circumstances in which the
statement was made or otherwise came into being
or from any other circumstances,
including, in the case of a statement contained in a document, the form and
contents of that document.
(3) In estimating the weight, if any, to be
attached to a statement admissible in evidence by virtue of any of sections 4,
5, 6 and
7of this Act regard shall be had to all the circumstances from which
any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the accuracy or
otherwise of the
statement and, in particular -
(a) in the case of a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 4 or subsection (1) or subsection (2) of section 5 of this Act, to the question whether or not the statement was made contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts stated, and to the question whether or not the maker of the statement had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts;
(b) in the case of a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 6 of this Act, to the question whether or not the person who originally supplied the information from which the record containing the statement was compiled did so contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts dealt with in that information, and to the question whether or not that person, or any person concerned with compiling or keeping the record containing the statement, had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts; and
(c) in the case of a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 7 of this Act, to the question whether or not the information which the information contained in the statement reproduces or is derived from was supplied to the relevant computer, or recorded for the purpose of being supplied thereto, contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts dealt with in that information, and to the question whether or not any person concerned with the supply of information to that computer, or with the operation of that computer or any equipment by means of which the document containing the statement was produced by it, had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts.
(4) For the purpose of any written law or rule of law
or practice requiring evidence to be corroborated or regulating the manner in
which uncorroborated evidence is to be treated -
(a) a statement which is admissible in evidence by virtue of section 4 or section 5 of this Act shall not be capable of corroborating evidence given by the maker of the statement; and
(b) a statement which is admissible in evidence by virtue of section 6 of this Act shall not be capable of corroborating evidence given by the person who originally supplied the information from which the record containing the statement was compiled.
(5) if any person in a certificate
rendered in evidence in civil proceedings by virtue of subsection (4) of section
7 of this Act
wilfully makes a statement material in those proceedings which he
knows to be false or does not believe to be true, he is guilty
of an offence and
is liable to imprisonment for two years.
ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF
CREDIBILITY OF MAKER, ETC., OF STATEMENT ADMITTED UNDER SECTION 4 OR SECTION
6
9. (1) Subject to rules of court, where in any civil
proceedings a statement made by a person who is not called as a witness in those
proceedings is given in evidence by virtue of section 4 of this Act -
(a) any evidence which, if that person had been so called, would be admissible for the purpose of destroying or supporting his credibility as a witness shall be admissible for that purpose in those proceedings; and
(b) evidence tending to prove that, whether before or after he made that statement, that person made, whether orally or in a document or otherwise, another statement inconsistent therewith shall be admissible for the purpose of showing that that person has contradicted himself:
Provided
that nothing in this subsection shall enable evidence to be given of any matter
of which, if the person in question had been
called as a witness and had denied
that matter in cross-examination, evidence could not have been adduced by the
cross-examining
party.
(2) Subsection (1) shall apply in relation to a
statement given in evidence by virtue of section 6 of this Act as it applies in
relation
to a statement given in evidence by virtue of section 4 of this Act,
except that references to the person who made the statement
and to his making
the statement shall be construed respectively as references to the person who
originally supplied the information
from which the record containing the
statement was compiled and to his supplying that information.
(3)
Subsection (1) of section 5 of this Act shall apply to any statement proved by
virtue of paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this
section as it applies to a
previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a
witness which is proved
as mentioned in paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of
section 5.
RULES OF COURT
10. (1) Provision shall be
made by rules of court as to the procedure which, subject to any exceptions
provided for in the rules, must
be followed and the other conditions, which,
subject as aforesaid, must be fulfilled before a statement can be given in
evidence
in civil proceedings by virtue of any of sections 4, 6 and 7 of this
Act.
(2) Rules of court made in pursuance of subsection (1) shall in
particular, subject to such exceptions, if any, as may be provided
for in the
rules -
(a) require a party to any civil proceedings who desires to give in evidence any such statement as is mentioned in that subsection to give to every other party to the proceedings such notice of his desire to do so and such particulars of or relating to the statement as may be specified in the rules, including particulars of such one or more of the persons connected with the making or recording of the statement or, in the case of a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 7 of this Act, such one or more of the persons concerned as mentioned in paragraph (c) of subsection (3) of section 8 of this Act as the rules may in any case require; and
(b) enable any party who receives such notice as aforesaid by counter-notice to require any person of whom particulars were given with the notice to be called as a witness in the proceedings unless that person is dead, is outside Nauru, is unfit by reason of his bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness, cannot with reasonable diligence be identified or found, or cannot reasonably be expected, having regard to the time which has elapsed since he was connected or concerned as aforesaid and to all the circumstances, to have any recollection of matters relevant to the accuracy or otherwise of the statement.
(3) Rules of court made in pursuance of subsection
(1) -
(a) may confer on the Court in any civil proceedings a discretion to allow a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 4, subsection (1) of section 6 or subsection (1) of section 7 of this Act to be given in evidence notwithstanding that any requirement of the rules affecting the admissibility of that statement: has not been complied with, but except in pursuance of paragraph (b) shall not confer on the Court a discretion to exclude such a statement where the requirements of the rules affecting its admissibility have been complied with;
(b) may confer on the Court power, where a party to any civil proceedings has given notice that he desires to give in evidence -
(i) a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 4 of this Act which was made by a person, whether orally or in a document in the course of giving evidence in some other legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal; or
(ii) a statement falling within subsection (1) of section 6 of this Act which is contained in a record of any direct oral evidence given in some other legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal;
to give directions on the application of any party to the proceedings as to whether, and if so on what conditions, the party desiring to give the statement in evidence will be permitted to do so and, where applicable, as to the manner in which that statement and any other evidence given in those other proceedings is to be proved, and
(c) may make different provision for different circumstances, and in particular may make different provision with respect to statements falling within subsection (1) of section 6 and subsection (1) of section 7 of this Act respectively;
and any discretion conferred on the Court by
rules of court made as aforesaid maybe either a general discretion or a
discretion exercisable
only in such circumstances as may be specified in the
rules.
(4) Rules of court may make provision for preventing a party to
any civil proceedings, subject to any exceptions provided for in the
rules, from
adducing in relation to a person who is not called as a witness in those
proceedings any evidence which could otherwise
be adduced by him, by virtue of section 9 of this Act unless that
party has in pursuance of the rules given in respect of that person such a
counter-notice
as is mentioned in paragraph (b) of subsection (2).
(5) In
deciding for the purposes of any rules of court made in pursuance of this
section whether or not a person is fit to attend
as a witness, a Court may act
on a certificate purporting to be a certificate of a medical
practitioner.
(6) Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this section
shall prejudice the generality of section 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 1972
or
any other written law conferring power to make rules of court; and nothing in
any written law restricting the matters with respect
to which rules of court may
be made shall prejudice the making of rules of court with respect to any matter
mentioned in the foregoing
provisions of this section or the operation of any
rules of court with respect to any matter mentioned in the foregoing provisions
of this section or the operation of any rules of court made with respect to any
such matter.
ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN HEARSAY EVIDENCE FORMERLY
ADMISSIBLE UNDER THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND AS ADOPTED
11. (1)
In any civil proceedings a statement which, if this Part of this Act had not
been passed, would by virtue of any rule of law
mentioned in subsection (2) have
been admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein shall be admissible as
evidence of that fact
by virtue of this subsection.
(2) The rules of law
referred to in subsection (1) above are the following, that is to say any rule
of law -
(a) whereby in any civil proceedings an admission adverse to a party to the proceedings, whether made by that party or by another person, may be given in evidence against that party for the purpose of proving any fact stated in the admission;
(b) whereby in any civil proceedings published works dealing with matters of a public nature (for example, histories, scientific works, dictionaries and maps) are admissible as evidence of facts of a public nature stated therein;
(c) whereby in any civil proceedings public documents (for example, public registers and returns made under public authority with respect to matters of public interest) are admissible as evidence of facts stated therein; or
(d) whereby in any civil proceedings records (for example, the records of certain Courts, treaties, pardons and commissions) are admissible as evidence of facts stated therein.
In this subsection "admission" includes
any representation of fact, whether made in words or otherwise.
(3) In
any civil proceedings a statement which tends to establish reputation or family
tradition with respect to any matter and which,
if this Act had not been passed,
would have been admissible in evidence by virtue of any rule of law mentioned in
subsection (4)
-
(a) shall be admissible in evidence by virtue of this paragraph in so far as it is not capable of being rendered admissible under section 4 or section 6 of this Act; and
(b) if given in evidence under this Part of this Act, whether by virtue of paragraph (a) or otherwise, shall by virtue of this paragraph be admissible as evidence of the matter reputed or handed down;
and, without prejudice to paragraph (b) above,
reputation shall for the purposes of this Part of this Act be treated as a fact
and
not as a statement or multiplicity of statements dealing with the matter
reputed.
(4) The rules of law referred to in subsection (3) are the
following, that is to say any rule of law -
(a) whereby in any civil proceedings evidence of a person's reputation is admissible for the purpose of establishing his good or bad character;
(b) whereby in any civil proceedings involving a question of pedigree or in which the existence of a marriage is in issue evidence of reputation or family tradition is admissible for the purpose of proving or disproving pedigree or the existence of the marriage, as the case may be; or
(c) whereby in any civil proceedings evidence of reputation or family tradition is admissible for the purpose of proving or disproving the existence of any public or general right or of identifying any person or thing.
(5) It is hereby declared that in so far as any
statement is admissible in any civil proceedings by virtue of subsection (1) or
paragraph
(a) of subsection (3), it may given in evidence in those proceedings
notwithstanding anything in sections 4 to 9 of this Act or in
any rules of court
made in pursuance of section 10 of this Act.
(6) The words in which any
rule of law mentioned in subsection (2) or subsection (4) is there described are
intended only to identify
the rule in question and shall not be construed as
altering that rule in any way.
PART III - MISCELLANEOUS
CONVICTIONS AS EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
12. (1)
In civil proceedings the fact that a person has been convicted of an offence by
or before any Court in Nauru or elsewhere shall,
subject to subsection (3), be
admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving, where to do so is relevant to
any issue in those
proceedings, that he committed that offence, whether he was
so convicted upon a plea of guilty or otherwise and whether or not he
is a party
to the civil proceedings; but no conviction other than a subsisting one shall be
admissible in evidence by virtue of this
section.
(2) In any civil
proceedings in which by virtue of this section a person is proved to have been
convicted of an offence by or before
any Court in Nauru or elsewhere -
(a) he shall be taken to have committed that offence unless the contrary is proved; and
(b) without prejudice to the reception of any other admissible evidence for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction was based, the contents of any document which is admissible as evidence of the conviction, and the contents of the information, complaint, indictment or charge on which the person in question was convicted, shall be admissible in evidence for that purpose.
(3) Nothing in this section shall prejudice the
operation of section 14 of this Act or any other written law whereby a
conviction
or a finding of fact in any criminal proceedings is for the purposes
of any other proceedings made conclusive evidence of any fact.
(4) Where
in any civil proceedings the contents of any document are admissible in evidence
by virtue of subsection (2), a copy of
that document, or of the material part
thereof, purporting to be certified or otherwise authenticated by or on behalf
of the Court
or authority having custody of that document shall be admissible in
evidence and hall be taken to be a true copy of that document
or part unless the
contrary is shown.
FINDINGS OF ADULTERY AND PATERNITY AS EVIDENCE IN
CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
13. (1) In any civil proceedings -
(a) the fact that in any matrimonial proceedings in any Court in Nauru to which he was a party a person has been found to have committed adultery; and
(b) the fact that a person has been adjudged to be the father of a child in affiliation or maintenance proceedings before any Court in Nauru;
shall, subject to subsection (3), be admissible in
evidence for the purpose of proving, where to do so is relevant to any issue in
those civil proceedings, that he committed the adultery to which the finding
relates or, as the case may be, is or was, the father
of that child, whether or
not he denied the allegation of adultery or paternity and whether or not he is a
party to the civil proceedings;
but no finding or adjudication other than a
subsisting one shall be admissible in evidence by virtue of this
section.
(2) In any civil proceedings in which by virtue of this section
a person is proved to have been found to have committed adultery as
mentioned in
paragraph (a) of subsection (1) or to have been adjudged to be the father of a
child as mentioned in paragraph (b) of
subsection (1) -
(a) he shall be taken to have committed the adultery to which the finding relates or, as the case may be, to be, or have been, the father of that child, unless the contrary is proved; and
(b) without prejudice to the reception of any other admissible evidence for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the finding or adjudication was based, the contents of any document which was before the Court, or which contains any pronouncement of the Court, in the matrimonial, affiliation or maintenance proceedings in question shall be admissible in evidence for that purpose.
(3) Nothing in this section shall prejudice the
operation of any written law whereby a finding of fact in any matrimonial,
affiliation
or maintenance proceedings is the purposes of any other proceedings
made conclusive evidence of any fact.
(4) Subsection (4) of section 12 of
this Act shall apply for the purposes of this section as if the reference to
subsection (2) were
a reference to subsection (2) of this
section.
CONCLUSIVENESS OF CONVICTIONS FOR PURPOSE OF DEFAMATION
ACTIONS
14. (1) In a suit for libel or slander in which the
question whether a person did or did not commit a criminal offence, in Nauru or
any
other country specified by the Minister by notice in the Gazette, is
relevant to an issue arising in the suit proof that at the time
when that issue
falls to be determined that person stands convicted, in Nauru or that other
country, of that offence shall be conclusive
evidence that he committed, that
offence; and his conviction thereof shall be admissible in evidence
accordingly.
(2) In any suit such as aforesaid in which by virtue of this
section a person is proved to have been convicted of an offence, the
contents of
any document which is admissible as evidence of the conviction, and the contents
of the information, complaint, indictment
or charge-sheet on which that person
was convicted, shall, without prejudice to the reception of any other admissible
evidence for
the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction was
based, be admissible in evidence for the purpose of identifying
those
facts.
(3) Subsection (4) of section 12 of this Act shall apply for the
purpose of this section as it applies for the purposes of that section,
but as
if in the said subsection (4) the reference to subsection (2) where a reference
to subsection (2) of this section.
(4) The foregoing provisions of this
section shall apply for the purposes of any suit begun after the commencement of
this Act, whenever
the cause of action arose, but shall not apply for the
purposes of any suit begun before the commencement of this Act or any appeal
or
other proceedings arising out of any such suit.
PRIVILEGE AGAINST
INCRIMINATION OF SELF OR SPOUSE
15. (1) The right of a person
in any legal proceedings other than criminal proceedings to refuse to answer any
question or produce any
document or thing if to do so would tend to expose that
person to proceedings for an offence or for the recovery of a penalty -
(a) shall apply only as regards criminal offences under the law of Nauru and penalties provided for by such law; and
(b) shall include a like right to refuse to answer any question or produce any document or thing if to do so would tend to expose the husband or wife of that person to proceedings for any such criminal offence or for the recovery of any such penalty.
(2) In so far as any existing written law
conferring, in whatever words, powers of inspection or investigation confers on
a person,
in whatever words, any right otherwise than in criminal proceedings to
refuse to answer any question or give any evidence tending
to incriminate that
person, subsection (1) shall apply to that right as it applies to the right
described in that subsection; and
every such existing written law shall be
construed accordingly.
(3) In so far as any existing written law
provides, in whatever words, that in any proceedings other than criminal
proceedings a person
shall not be excused from answering any question or giving
any evidence on the ground that to do so may incriminate that person,
that
written law shall be construed as providing also that in such proceedings a
person shall not be excused from answering any question
or giving any evidence
on the ground that to do so may incriminate the husband or wife or that
person.
(4) Where any existing written law, however worded, that
-
(a) confers powers of inspection or investigation; or
(b) provides as mentioned in subsection (3),
further
provides, in whatever words, that any answer or evidence given by a person shall
not be admissible in evidence against that
person in any proceedings or class of
proceedings, however described, and whether criminal or not, that written law
shall be construed
as providing also that any answer or evidence given by that
person shall not be admissible in evidence against the husband or wife
of that
person in the proceedings or class of proceedings in question.
(5) In
this section "existing written law" means any written law enacted, made or
adopted before this Act; and the references to giving
evidence are references to
giving evidence in any manner, whether by furnishing information, making
discovery, producing documents
or otherwise.
ABOLITION OF CERTAIN
PRIVILEGES
16. (1) The following rules of law are hereby
abrogated except in relation to criminal proceedings, that is to say -
(a) the rule whereby, in any legal proceedings, a person cannot be compelled to answer any question or produce any document or thing if to do so would tend to expose him to a forfeiture; and
(b) the rule whereby, in any legal proceedings, a person other than a party to the proceedings cannot be compelled to produce any deed or other document relating to his title to any land.
(2) The rule of law
whereby in any civil proceedings, a party to the proceedings cannot be compelled
to produce any document relating
solely to his own case and in no way tending to
impeach that case or support the case of any opposing party is hereby
abrogated.
(3) Section 3 of the Evidence (Amendment) Act 1853 of England,
an applied Statute which provides that a husband or wife shall not
be
compellable to disclose any communication made to him or her by his or her
spouse during the marriage, shall cease to have effect
except in relation to
criminal proceedings.
(4) A witness in any proceedings instituted in
consequence of adultery, whether party to the proceedings or not, shall not be
excused
from answering any question by reason that it tends to show that he or
she has committed adultery; and accordingly the proviso to
section 3 of the
Evidence Further Amendment Act 1869 of England, an applied statute, shall cease
to have effect.
CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO
PRIVILEGE
17. (1) Where a person is examined by virtue of an
order under section 1 of the Foreign Tribunals Evidence Act 1856 of England, an
applied
statute, or section 1 of the Evidence by Commission Act 1859 of England,
an applied statute, made by a Court or judge in Nauru for
the purpose of
obtaining his testimony in relation to any legal proceedings pending before a
Court or tribunal outside Nauru, then
for the purpose of determining his rights
under section 5 of the said Act of 1856 or section 4 of the said Act of 1859 to
refuse
to answer questions or produce documents -
(a) if those proceedings are criminal proceedings, the provisions of sections 15 and 16 of this Act shall disregarded; but
(b) in any other case the references in the said section 5 or the said section 4, as the case may be, to any cause pending as mentioned in that section shall be construed as references to any civil cause so pending.
(2)
Subsection (5) of section 15 of this Act shall apply for the purposes of this
section as it applies for the purposes of that section.
------------------------------------------------------
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/nr/legis/num_act/cea1972130