![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
[Report an error]
[F.A.Q.]
High Court of Fiji |
[Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT
SUVA
CRIMINAL
JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO.: HAC 141 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
THE STATE
v.
VILIAME GAUNA
Mr. P. Bulamainaivalu
for the State
In
Person - Accused
RULING
The Applicant faces charges of robbery with violence,
damaging property and unlawful use of motor vehicle. The alleged offences were
committed on the 14th of June 2008. He has been in custody since that date. He
now applies for bail, on the grounds that he is presumed
innocent until proven
guilty, that the prosecution case is not strong and that he needs to instruct
counsel of his own choice.
The State opposes bail, pointing to the
seriousness of the charges, the Applicant’s previous record and his other
pending cases
in other courts. In one of these, he is alleged to have been in
possession of illicit drugs and his case is pending in the Lautoka
High Court.
State counsel accepts that there is no confession by the Applicant, but says
that there is circumstantial evidence proving
participation.
The
Applicant has a right to bail, except where the presumption in favour of bail is
rebutted by a record of absconding, or where
the prosecution has shown the court
that the Applicant is a flight risk.
In this case, the Applicant has an
unimpressive record of robbery with violence (2001), shop breaking (2001, 2004)
and several counts
of resisting arrest. In 2005 he was convicted of escaping
from lawful custody. There is no doubt at all, that this record together
with
his pending cases, make the Applicant a flight risk. I would be failing in my
duty to the public if I were to allow the Applicant
bail in the circumstances. I
accept that he is unlikely to be tried in the next eight months and will
continue to review bail.
Bail is refused.
[Nazhat
Shameem]
JUDGE
At Suva
29th September 2008
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback|
Report an error
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2008/237.html